Join Fox News for access to this content
The maximum number of articles has been reached. To read more, log in for free or create an account.
Please enter a valid email address.
Enter your email address[続行]By pressing , you agree to Fox News' Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including notice of financial incentives. Please check your email and follow the instructions provided to access the content. Need help? Click here.
The jury in the case of George Alan Kelly, an Arizona rancher charged with second-degree murder in connection with the death of a Mexican man whose body was found shot to death on his border ranch in January 2023, Could not reach a verdict.
The jury began deliberating on April 18th. After several days of failing to reach a verdict, the judge overseeing the trial declared a mistrial on Monday.
The case centers on the death of Gabriel Quen-Buytimea, a Mexican national who was found shot to death on January 30, 2023, on Kelly's 170-acre cattle ranch near Kino Springs, outside Nogales, Arizona. Ta.
Kelly's defense attorneys disputed prosecutors' claims that Quyen-Buitimare was an unarmed immigrant and suggested that cartel influence muddied the death investigation.
Arizona rancher's defense consultant alleges 'cartel influence' in murder investigation, reveals sheriff's past comments
George Alan Kelly enters the courtroom for a preliminary hearing at Nogales Justice Court in Nogales, Arizona.
“The long and short of it is, this is not a person simply seeking the American dream. There is no evidence that this person came here with any such benign purpose,” Kelly's attorney Brenna Larkin said Thursday. stated in his closing argument. “And we bring this up, you know, not to be critical of Gabriel or to have no sympathy for him. But when people get caught up in criminal lifestyles, it's It's dangerous. It's inherently more dangerous than just being an immigrant coming here.'' So it's related to that reason. ”
Quyen-Buytimea has entered the country illegally multiple times and was deported in 2016.
Over several weeks, jurors heard testimony about where and how far Kelly was standing when prosecutors say he shot Quyen-Boutimere and his motive for the shooting.
The defense argued that Kelly had only fired warning shots into the air from the patio of his home earlier in the day, while his wife, Wanda Kelly, was wearing camouflage and carrying a rifle and a backpack. He said he spotted two armed men walking with about 100 people and called the Border Patrol's contact number at the ranch. It is located a few meters from their house. Several hours passed before law enforcement responded to the scene and Kelly called Border Patrol again to report the discovery of the body.
The fatal bullet was never recovered from the scene. Dr. Ron Martinelli, a criminologist who is working pro bono as a consultant for Kelly's defense, previously told Fox News Digital that none of the state's witnesses in the trial believed that the Rip Crew was responsible. He said he had not provided any testimony rebutting his side's theory. He was sometimes affiliated with the cartel and may have shot and robbed Quyen-Buitimare.
Wife of Arizona rancher George Alan Kelley testifies in murder trial about armed groups near border area
Santa Cruz County Sheriff David Hathaway was pressed by the defense about an online video that showed Kelly speculating that he wanted to “go hunting Mexicans.”
“You say to Big Soopers, 'I caught this rancher shooting at immigrants,' and then you say, 'There are some people who want to come and hunt Mexicans.' Did you say that?'' the defense attorney asked Hathaway on Wednesday. Big Super is the name of his real estate YouTube personality, whose videos were featured as Hathaway toured border neighborhoods.
Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink listens to opening arguments in the trial of George Alan Kelly. (Angela Gervasi/Nogales International, via AP)
“Oh, yeah,” Hathaway replied, “I just said colloquially, 'There are some people who want to go hunt Mexicans.'” Yes, he did say that. ”
Martinelli also claimed on Fox News Digital that Hathaway violated U.S. State Department protocol and Mexican law by arranging an unauthorized meeting to interview Daniel Ramirez in Nogales, Mexico, weeks after the shooting. . Prosecutors argued that Ramirez was the only witness to Quyen-Buitimare's shooting and then fled across the border.
Ramirez testified that he had carried drugs across the border before, although not on the day of the January 2023 shooting.
The defense argued that, based on Ramirez's own testimony, it appears he was not even present that day. The jury was able to tour Kelly's ranch to get an idea of the condition of the land.
“The only conclusion that can be reached based on Daniel's description of this property is that he was not there,” Larkin said. “We cannot convict Mr. Kelly of aggravated assault on Daniel because Daniel was not present. And because there was no evidence that Alan shot this person, we cannot convict Mr. Kelly of any charge, including second-degree murder or less. They cannot be found guilty either. They have to prove it.”
Mr Larkin told jurors that Mr Kelly was in “risk for his life” and was “held at rifle point”, meaning the use of deadly physical force was justified. Ta.
But even if that were the case, the rancher “did not use deadly physical force,” Larkin said in closing arguments. “He fired into the air above the trees, above where people could stop making threats.”
George Alan Kelly listens to the prosecution's opening argument in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. (Angela Gervasi/Nogales International, via AP)
“The law doesn't say you can't use less force to protect yourself. The law doesn't say that when you were there in the middle of nowhere. This is Nogales. It's not downtown. This isn't a populated city. It's isolated,” Larkin told jurors. “He could fire a warning shot to protect himself and his wife, and that's exactly what he did. Any man who values his wife and his family would want to take a threat like the one he faced. That's what you should do in this situation when you're faced with.'' ”
In the state's closing argument, prosecutor Mike Jett told jurors that Kelly saw “two unarmed men walking two fences away” and “stepped onto the patio with an AK-47 drawn. I saw him in the room and shot him nine times without giving him any verbal warning.''
“He's de-escalating the situation. My wife is fine,” Jett said Thursday. “You have no right to use deadly force to protect someone you didn’t have to protect. You have no right to use deadly force when there is no threat to your home or yard. There is no right to initiate, incite or escalate using force.”
“Gabriel and Daniel were shot. Gabriel was killed by a high-powered weapon, an AK-47. The entrance and exit wounds were aligned with the defendant's property,” the prosecutor said. “Ejected, no verbal warning. The defendant fired nine shots from the AK. The shell casings prove it. The ejection pattern proves where he was standing. The position and orientation of Gabriel's body shows the shots were fired. It proves where you came from.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Jett concluded by telling the jury that even if they were not satisfied with the second-degree murder charge, they could still convict Kelly on lesser charges of manslaughter, manslaughter or aggravated assault.
Mr. Kelly made national headlines last year when he was held on $1 million bail for several weeks on first-degree murder charges. The maximum charge was later reduced to second-degree murder.
Earlier this year, the rancher rejected an agreement from prosecutors to reduce the charge to one count of negligent homicide if he agreed to plead guilty.